Photojournalists take pictures as former US President Donald Trump attends his trial for allegedly covering up hush money payments linked to extramarital affairs, at Manhattan Criminal Court in New York City on April 26, 2024. – Trump’s defense team vied to probe holes in tabloid publisher David Pecker’s testimony during the trial on April 25, after jurors heard days of testimony regarding a plot to kill salacious stories that could have thwarted the Republican’s 2016 White House bid. (Photo by Curtis Means / POOL / AFP)
A former tabloid publisher who squashed potentially embarrassing stories about Donald Trump was back on the witness stand on Friday being grilled by lawyers of the former US president.
David Pecker, 72, has testified for four days in the trial of Trump, accused of falsifying business records to buy the silence of porn star Stormy Daniels about an alleged 2006 sexual encounter that could have derailed his 2016 White House campaign.
Pecker, the first witness in the blockbuster trial, has outlined under questioning from prosecutors a scheme known as “catch and kill,” which involved purchasing and then burying salacious stories which could have been damaging to the real estate tycoon.
Trump, 77, the first former US president to face criminal charges, is accused of engaging in “election fraud” by having his then-personal lawyer Michael Cohen make a $130,000 payment to Daniels on the eve of the 2016 election against Hillary Clinton.
The high-stakes trial requires Trump to report to the drafty Manhattan courtroom multiple times a week, restricting his time on the campaign trail less than seven months before his likely election rematch with President Joe Biden.
Speaking to reporters in a hallway before entering court on Friday, Trump wished his wife, Melania, a happy birthday.
“It’d be nice to be with her but I’m at a courthouse for a rigged trial,” he said.
Pecker, whose outlets included the National Enquirer tabloid, testified this week about a hush money payment to Karen McDougal, a former Playboy model who claimed to have had a year-long affair with Trump that was a precursor to the Daniels saga.
Pecker explained how transfers to the tune of $150,000 were made to “catch and kill” McDougal’s story and suppress its publication, calling it a “large purchase” relative to the sums his company would normally pay for content.
He said payments to McDougal were disguised as services to American Media, the tabloid’s parent company, to avoid violating campaign finance laws.
“We purchased the story so it would not be published by any other organization,” Pecker told the jury. “We didn’t want the story to embarrass Mr. Trump or hurt his campaign.”
Pecker said Trump called him and was “very upset.”
When it came to squashing Daniels’ tale of her alleged sexual encounter with Trump, Pecker said he hesitated to pay for yet another story.
“I’m not a bank,” he said.
The executive suggested to Cohen that he pay for it instead, which prosecutors say the then-Trump fixer did.
The specific charge facing Trump of falsifying business records stems from his reimbursements to Cohen for the payment to Daniels.
During defense cross-examination which began on Thursday, Emil Bove, a Trump attorney sought to ruffle Pecker by noting timeline inconsistencies, while also casting the “catch and kill” tactics described by prosecutors as “business as usual.”
Trump has appeared increasingly disgruntled, angry even, as the trial proceeds.
He complained Friday that the courtroom was “freezing” and that it was “on purpose I believe.”
In addition to the New York case, Trump has been indicted in Washington and Georgia on charges of conspiring to overturn the results of the 2020 election.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Why are you flagging this comment?
I disagree with this user
Targeted harassment - posted harassing comments or discussions targeting me, or encouraged others to do so
Spam - posted spam comments or discussions
Inappropriate profile - profile contains inappropriate images or text
Threatening content - posted directly threatening content
Private information - posted someone else''s personally identifiable information
Before flagging, please keep in mind that Disqus does not moderate communities. Your username will be shown to the moderator, so you should only flag this comment for one of the reasons listed above.
We will review and take appropriate action.
Get the latest news delivered straight to your inbox every day of the week. Stay informed with the Guardians leading coverage of Nigerian and world news, business, technology and sports.
Follow Us