The public hearings into the mass killings of people in Matabeleland and the Midlands in the early years of Zimbabwe’s independence must adhere to international best practice on conflict resolution.

Mugabe virtually criminalised any open discussion about the genocide as he avoided taking blame for the progrom that led to the death of an estimated 20 000 people that were mainly supporters of the then opposition Zapu party and its former military wing Zpra that was led by the late vice president Joshua Nkomo.

Thousands of innocent people disappeared during the dark period and several women were raped by members of Five Brigade and suspected dissidents.

Mnangagwa, who was a state security minister during Gukurahundi and had a strong hand in the military campaign, has given chiefs a leading role in what he says is a home grown solution to a problem that has remained an albatross on Zimbabwe’s neck.

The traditional leaders are about to start public hearings on the genocide as part of the healing process.

Last week we were alarmed by remarks attributed to Zimbabwe Chiefs Council deputy president Fortune Charumbira at a workshop for editors held in Bulawayo where he said Gukurahundi should not be classified as genocide.

Charumbira has no right to tell the victims how they should frame their stories. The process must never be prescriptive if it is to achieve its stated goals of unity in the country.

Zimbabwe can learn from countries such as Rwanda and South Africa that have undergone successful national healing processes after bitter conflicts.

 There is absolutely no need to reinvent the wheel when we can borrow from those success stories drawn from the continent, or risk embarking on a process that will leave Zimbabweans even more divided  because of an issue that should have been solved a long time ago.

Subscribe to our newsletter and stay updated on the latest developments and special offers!

©2024. The Standard. All rights reserved.